Grounded in research · Professional development for educators

Most educator training focuses on what you deliver.
The CARE Method starts with who you are in the room.

The CARE Method trains educators to use their own regulated presence as a tool. The result: classrooms where students feel safe enough to learn.

The four pillars
CCo-regulation
AAwareness
RRegulation
EEnvironment
8Research studies
5Programs
4Pillars
575,361 students across 53 countries confirm: training educators in their own social-emotional skills is what shifts outcomes. Cipriano et al., 2023
Grounded in research Grounded in 8 peer-reviewed studies Across 8 peer-reviewed research traditions
Digital microcredential CARE Pro Microcredential Aligned with the European Approach to Microcredentials
Built by practitioners MSc Psychology · MA Education Psychological, educational, and classroom experience combined
Why it matters

The educator's nervous system
is the classroom.

Across 18 countries, more than half of all children have had at least one adverse childhood experience before turning 18 (Madigan et al. · JAMA Pediatrics · 2025). In a class of 25, that's more than 12 students who aren't "ready to learn" before the lesson even starts. Meanwhile, educators are asked to manage increasingly dysregulated classrooms with no training in their own regulation. A dysregulated educator cannot co-regulate a dysregulated student. No behavioural strategy changes that. The CARE Method focuses on the one variable most programs skip: the adult in the room.

🧠

Neurobiologically grounded

Every CARE Method practice works through a documented mechanism: the parasympathetic nervous system, vagal tone, or interoceptive awareness. Each pillar is backed by named, peer-reviewed research. No pseudoscience. No wellness-washing.

⏱

Realistic for real classrooms

Every exercise fits into an ordinary school day, no extra curriculum time needed. The R pillar toolkit has practices you can reach for in under 90 seconds, in a room full of children, on a hard day.

🔄

A cycle, not a checklist

Co-regulation, Awareness, Regulation, and Environment reinforce each other. Each pillar makes the others easier. The method builds over time instead of wearing you down.

The CARE Method is a professional competence framework, not a mindfulness curriculum or a wellbeing add-on. It treats the educator's regulated presence as a teaching skill, and trains it like one.

Want to feel how this works before reading further? Try the 90-second body scan, a free exercise from the Awareness pillar.

Try the free exercise →
The method

Four pillars. One continuous cycle.

Pillar 01
Co-regulation

How you walk into the room matters more than what you say in it.

The educator's nervous system sets the emotional tone for the whole room. This pillar trains educators to notice their own presence as a professional tool, one that signals safety or threat before a word is spoken. It starts with self-management, because a co-regulated classroom starts with a co-regulated adult.

Pillar 02
Awareness

You cannot regulate what you cannot notice: in yourself or in your students.

Awareness is the pause between stimulus and response. This pillar builds self-awareness and social awareness together: reading your own state and the class's mood at the same time. Interoceptive sensitivity can be trained. It grows through practice and a stronger emotional vocabulary (Craig · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · 2009).

Pillar 03
Regulation

A 90-second tool that works when willpower does not.

In the CARE Method, regulation works bottom-up before it works top-down. When a nervous system is dysregulated, the thinking skills you'd need to calm down are the first to go offline. The R pillar gives educators short, body-based practices for themselves and their class, any day, no extra time needed.

Pillar 04
Environment

The classroom that regulates itself: through design, not discipline.

Environment is the most structural of the four pillars: relational climate, physical space, and the rituals that organise the day. A meta-analysis of 424 studies and 575,361 students across 53 countries backs SEL's effect on classroom climate (Cipriano et al. · Child Development · 2023). This pillar is what makes the other three sustainable across a full school year.

Our programs

Start where you are.
Go as deep as you need.

CARE Method programs meet schools and individuals where they are, whatever the starting point, time, or context. Each one works on its own. Each one also leads naturally to the next level.

01a
Introductory Workshop
02
CARE Pro Certification
03
School Implementation
04
Municipal Program
Program 01a · Entry point

Introductory Workshop

A compact, 1.5-hour hands-on session at your school: a structured encounter with the method, not a lecture. Participants leave having done the exercises, felt their effects, and picked up the vocabulary and tools to start using them the next day.

1.5 hours In-person, at your school Up to 30 participants
Self-paced · Online

Online Workshops

Prefer to start on your own time? Selected CARE Method workshops, including the Introductory Workshop, are available as self-paced courses on our online learning platform. Good for individual educators getting started alone, or as the online-delivery option in a school's agreement with us.

Self-paced Individual or school access On our online learning platform
Program 03

School Implementation Program

A structured six-month program for school leaders who know that lasting change takes more than one workshop day. It opens with a whole-staff introductory session, then moves through one pillar a month, Co-regulation, Awareness, Regulation, Environment, giving staff time to use each pillar's tools before the next one starts. Delivered fully in person, fully online through our learning platform, or as a hybrid, whichever fits your school.

6-month programme 1.5h introductory workshop 4 monthly pillar sessions In-person, online, or hybrid Final implementation report
Program 04

Municipal Program

The scaled version of the School Implementation Program, built for municipalities rolling out the CARE Method across several schools at once. It runs on a hub-and-spoke model. Arlena Collective delivers core training and quality checks. Trained key staff at each school carry the method forward. This builds internal capacity, not ongoing dependence on outside consultants.

Multiple schools CARE Pro for key persons Cross-school network sessions Evaluation reports

Educators who build a personal practice without institutional support tend to drift back. Institutions that adopt new structures without individual competence get compliance, not real change. The CARE Method is built to work at both levels.

The four pillars work beyond the core school setting too, in SFO and after-school programs, special education settings, resource rooms, and residential care. We can adapt the delivery format on request. Contact us to discuss your context.

After years working in different classrooms and countries, we kept seeing the same thing: educators who cared, who knew their subject, who showed up to every training day, and who were still struggling. Not from a lack of information. They were running on empty, physiologically. We built the CARE Method around one insight: the missing piece was never another program to deliver. It was the educator's own capacity to feel regulated enough to be present.

Nina and Núria  · Founders, Arlena Collective
The people behind it

Two practitioners.
One shared conviction.

Nina and Núria built the CARE Method after noticing the same gap in classrooms across different countries: school wellbeing provision almost never reaches the educator's own nervous system. We bring together psychology, developmental psychology, educator training, and somatic practice. The result is rigorous enough for a PPR (school psychological services) psychologist and practical enough to survive a busy Monday morning in year 4.

We believe educators cannot give what they do not have. The CARE Method exists to change that.

N

Nina

MSc in Psychology · Educational practitioner

Working across schools and classrooms, I've talked with a lot of educators at the end of a long day, people who gave everything they had and still felt it wasn't enough. Usually, that wasn't about care. It was about tools: educators standing in a room full of struggling children, never taught what actually happens in a nervous system under stress, or how they themselves could help.

N

Núria

Learning and Guidance Specialist · MA Education · BSc Psychology

I've been there. The educator who changed her approach five times, asked every experienced colleague she could find, and still walked away with no solutions. The time when things changed was when I brought "the body" into the room, not as a curriculum activity but as a tool to help me and my students regulate. What worked for me in that moment was a short breathing and movement break, and my students kept asking for it afterward. That question stayed with me: what if regulation was something educators were actually taught?

The evidence base

Grounded in research.
Transparent about what that means.

Every CARE Method pillar is grounded in peer-reviewed research: developmental psychology, social-emotional learning, and trauma-informed pedagogy. We name every study, so you can read it yourself. That's a commitment to show our work, not just talk about it.

Cipriano et al. · Child Development · 2023

Across 424 studies, training educators in their own social-emotional skills was one of only two factors that predicted SEL success. Curriculum activities and family engagement alone did not.

The largest SEL meta-analysis to date. Effects held across 53 countries: skills, wellbeing, peer relationships, school safety, and grades. This is why the CARE Method starts with the educator.

575,361 students across 53 countries · 424 studies · The strongest evidence base for what makes SEL work
Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki, Taylor and Schellinger · Child Development · 2011

School-based SEL programs produced an 11-point gain in academic scores.

This meta-analysis covered 213 SEL programs and 270,034 students. It shows emotional skill is core teaching practice, not an add-on.

Foundational study
Jennings and Greenberg · Review of Educational Research · 2009

Educator social-emotional skill is the link between SEL theory and classroom outcomes.

The Prosocial Classroom model: educator SEC predicts classroom climate, student outcomes, and SEL quality. Skip it, and burnout follows, hurting both the educator and the students.

Foundational study
Rosanbalm and Murray · OPRE Brief · 2017

Co-regulation isn't a supplement to self-regulation. It's the foundation self-regulation is built on. Children build the neural pathways for self-regulation through repeated, reliable contact with a regulated adult.

The foundational research behind the C pillar: before a child can regulate alone, they must have been regulated in relationship, repeatedly and reliably.

Madigan et al. · JAMA Pediatrics · 2025

Across 65 studies and 490,423 children in 18 countries, 58% had experienced at least one adverse childhood experience (ACE) before turning 18.

The most current peer-reviewed source measuring ACE rates in children. In a class of 25, that's more than 12 students who are not "ready to learn" before the lesson even starts.

Foundational study
Craig · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · 2009

Interoceptive sensitivity isn't fixed. It develops through deliberate practice.

The neural basis of interoception, sensing the body's internal states, can be trained. The A pillar is built on this: awareness can be taught, not just hoped for.

Lehrer and Gevirtz · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · 2014

Slow, paced breathing measurably increases vagal tone. It supports a physiological shift from sympathetic activation toward a regulated state.

The evidence anchor for the CARE Method's breathing practices in the R pillar.

Shi and Cheung · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · 2024

Giving educators their own social-emotional skills was one of only two factors that predicted SEL outcomes at the classroom level.

A meta-analysis confirming the CARE Method's design logic. Full citation: Shi, J. and Cheung, A. C. K. (2024). Effective components of social emotional learning programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53, 755–771.

On the evidence: The CARE Method draws on peer-reviewed research. That includes developmental psychology, social-emotional learning, polyvagal-informed practice, and trauma-informed pedagogy. As a full program, it hasn't yet been through an independent randomised controlled trial. Independent evaluation is a priority for us. We're actively seeking research partners.
Frequently asked

Questions we hear
all the time.

No. The CARE Method sits alongside your existing approach and deepens it. If your school already works with Low Arousal, AKT (adfaerds-, kontakt-, og trivselsindsats), or a trivselsprogram (wellbeing program), the CARE Method adds the one thing most other programs leave out: the educator's own regulation. You don't need to replace anything that's already working.
Some changes show up within days, especially in transition quality and class settling time, since these depend mostly on the educator's own regulated presence, which shifts quickly with practice. Deeper changes, like student emotional vocabulary and self-regulation, usually take 6 to 12 weeks of consistent practice. The biggest shift, a real change in classroom culture, takes a full term or more.
The CARE Method is evidence-informed. That means it's grounded in established research across several theoretical traditions, but as a complete program, it hasn't yet been independently evaluated. We call it evidence-informed rather than evidence-based to be honest about that gap. Independent evaluation is a priority, and we're actively seeking research partnerships.
Yes, and we encourage it. The Introductory Workshop is a low-commitment first step that gives your staff a genuine sense of the method. Many school leaders want to see how their team responds before committing further, and that's a sensible approach. There's no obligation to continue. Many schools that start with the Introductory Workshop go on to bring the CARE Method further into their school within the same year.
Yes. The same principles, nervous system safety, co-regulation, body-based practices, environmental design, apply anywhere adults are responsible for children's emotional development. We adapt the language, format, and exercises to fit your context. Contact us to talk about your situation.
Get in touch

Ready to bring the
CARE Method to your school?

Whether you want to start with a single workshop or explore a full school implementation: we would love to hear from you.

We'll ask about your context, the challenges you're facing, and what you're hoping to change. Then we'll tell you honestly what makes sense, and what doesn't. We respond to every enquiry within 2 working days.

Send us a message

All fields marked with * are required. We respond within 2 working days.

Message received.

Thank you for reaching out. We will be in touch within 2 working days.

or email us directly